Knowledge Street :: Newsletter
Knowledge Street :: Subscribe to Directions
Knowledge Street :: Client Access to the Extranet

 

Knowledge Street - Home
Knowledge Street - Directions Newsletter

 

In This Issue...

 

Another Social Networking Tie-In

 

Street Smarts 083

 

Flow Charts as Knowledge Maps

 

PowerPoint: Pro or Con?

 

 

 

Directions Archives

Knowledge Street: Street Smarts

083 This month’s tip:

Nurture new ideas.

New ideas can come from anywhere, but they can only grow in an environment that provides the right kind of care and feeding. They need to be nurtured, or they're likely to die on the vine.

You can approach this problem at any level of technology. A plain old suggestion box works fine, as long as someone actually reads and acts on the suggestions (and lets the organization know that this particular idea came from so-and-so in engineering). Blogs and wikis and other Web-based collaboration tools could be adapted to serve this purpose, and there are specialized applications that do much more. Some of the high-tech approaches submit suggestions to a kind of virtual marketplace, where co-workers can comment, collaborate and "invest" in their development.

How you do it is relatively unimportant, but doing it is. Innovation is a primary driver of competitive advantage, and you need all the new ideas you can get.

Share/Save/Bookmark

 

 July 2010 - Volume 8, Issue 7

Intelligence Multipliers

Effective leadership is the single most important success factor for a Knowledge Management program, something that's equally true for most organizational change initiatives. If people believe something is really supported from the top, they'll get on the bandwagon. If not, they're more likely to wait for developments. So KM practitioners need to consider the nature of leadership, starting with their own.

Multipliers is a new book from leadership consultant Liz Wiseman, which explores the fact that the best leaders are able to leverage the collective intelligence of an entire organization. After a two-year study of 150 leaders in 35 companies, she concluded that some people are promoted because of their savvy and intelligence, but are then unable to see beyond their own abilities. They tend to drain the intelligence from the room, and diminish group performance. Others create an environment that encourages new ideas to be heard. These are the leaders she calls “multipliers.” They make everyone smarter and more capable.

If you find these thoughts intriguing, you can get more information in a number of ways. You can read it in short form as a ChangeThis manifesto, you can listen to an NPR radio interview from early July, or you can just go to Amazon and buy the book!

Another Social Networking Tie-In

We've come across an imaginative mash-up of social networking and old-fashioned commerce. It's something called Groupon, and it's designed to connect local businesses with new customers. It's clearly aimed at a younger demographic, with its promise of "cool" and "awesome" things to do, but the idea is interesting.

Merchants (restaurants, shops, theaters, and the like) agree to offer some kind of discounted service. Groupon users register for a particular geographic area, and are offered one such discount each day. What's different is that the discount is only activated if a predefined number of people buy. So the merchant can set a minimum number of customers and knows in advance how much new business it will bring in. Groupon users who see a good deal are motivated to promote it themselves, in order to reach the minimum. If it works, the users are emailed a coupon; if not the deal expires at midnight.

It's also interesting that while most Web businesses seem to have a global audience in mind, this one is decidedly local in nature. It's a good example of the new ideas that come bubbling to the surface with wireless Web technology.

Flow Charts as Knowledge Maps

We always tell people that Knowledge Management systems don't need to be complicated, and in many cases complexity does more harm than good. Given that we're awash in choices these days, something that's simple and immediate is more effective than something that's complex and time-consuming. Something as simple as a checklist can capture the essence of a process and make it easily repeatable. That's a great way to pass key knowledge from the expert to the novice, or to be sure that the same understanding is shared by everyone on a team.

To take it up a level, you can move from checklists to flow charts, thereby allowing for decision points and conditional paths. You'd be surprised how well a simple flow chart works if you want to reveal inefficent or redundant process steps. We've had lots of whiteboard sessions with clients, aimed at process improvement. And when people see it broken down in a logical way, they often have the same question: "Why are we still doing this step? It doesn't lead anywhere!"

The power of a flow chart also means it's a potential platform for humor, and since this is a mid-summer issue of Directions, we're offering a few examples. They're good flow charts, but they're funny too. They can help you decide what to eat, choose a career and whether to get a tattoo.

PowerPoint: Pro or Con?

Like Apple vs. Microsoft, or Star Wars vs Star Trek, there's an ongoing conversation about the relative evil of PowerPoint. By putting the ability to create "professional" presentation materials in the hands of rank amateurs, PowerPoint changed the game of business communications. On some level then, PowerPoint is to blame for millions of tedious, mind-numbing hours of poorly-conceived, badly-executed, self-important presentations. It's contributed to the erosion of thoughtful documentation, by encouraging people to reduce their ideas to bullets. One of our heroes, designer Edward Tufte, would love to see the end of PowerPoint. But another, writer David Weinberger, thinks PowerPoint bashing is over done.

Writing in KM World, Weinberger notes that while PowerPoint is certainly not without its flaws, it does help "bring order to unruly thoughts." Before it became the norm, lots of presenters would just stand up and improvise, so the quality of information transfer was no better. He thinks PowerPoint has forced presenters to become more analytic, simply by making them to follow a predefined sequence, in which one point follows another, together with supporting information.

We come down on Weinberger's side of this argument. A well executed presentation, delivered by a skilled presenter, is one of the most powerful communications tools in your arsenal. Even if it's built in PowerPoint.

   Subscribe    |   Unsubscribe    |   Change your profile

 

HOME   |    © COPYRIGHT 2012 KNOWLEDGE STREET LLC